🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.